You are viewing scalarparty

Exuberant Pantaphobia - koyaanisqHOTsi ! [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
scalarparty

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| !SB.CT.GM! !EcoChick! !RealClimate! !ViridianManifesto! Razzi ]

koyaanisqHOTsi ! [Aug. 24th, 2007|12:56 am]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
[Tags|, , , , ]

I get it! ...it's 'cause they're from iceland! Right??
poster

i went to see Leo Di's new movie (Leo Leila & Nadia's movie; The 11th Hour. Pretty impressive. Lots of Bioneers doing what they do best -explaining the situation (or most of it- he doesn't go that deep into climate change), and examining the multi-causal planetary breakdown that is now starting to happen. And by the last third of the flick, it's peppered with solution on top of solution. And with 52 interviews, while everyone only gets a few moments here & there to push the -well structured- parts of the essay, it does present a cohesive argument for action and optimism. And it's full of archival imagery, and a total buzzclip intro (i guess if you know me, you'd know i dig that).

And cool music. At one poignant moment --a peaceful lull after a particularly tense earth-in-crisis montage, there was even some Sigur Rós with whom to fly-over ice-fields
SigurRós
i was thinking 'Wow Ágætis byrjun, what an odd choice'... but now i get it! they're from Iceland! And at the time, the visuals were these relaxed pan-o-rama ice shots from greenland. which is a land full of (that melting) ice... cute

And just like i like it, they really looked at as wide an angle as they perhaps felt they could (Meat was shockingly absent in this movie). Which is really the best way to deal with climate change, omnilateraly, right? But they are not just looking at climate change -thought it's a big part of it, but almost everything. Almost to the point like what i was accused of back in the day (getting chewed out by a documentary legend); that you can't try to solve all of the worlds problems in one movie. And i am sure some critics will accuse these Directors/Writer/Producers of just that (if they stop harping on his flight patterns). But fuck 'em Leo, personally I agree that that is the way the story ought to be told. This is about our evolution or sticking to a lifestyle that east its young till theres nothing left... why pussyfoot around that? Why deal with CO2s and NOXs when it goes so much deeper and people really have to "get it" if they're going to commit to it. At one point someone quotes someone else (sorry for being vague but with 52 interviews in 90 minutes its hard to remember who said what, i just remember he said it was a quote: After asking what we are really looking for with all this hyperconsumption: "One can never really be full, if they're filling themselves with things that they don't really want" or something like that. And that and climate change are in as much of a dance, as emissions or cows or hurricanes...

Their view of stuff like the rainforests was obviously different than mine as there's room for hope and optimism even there, but all in all, it is a moving eye opener for anyone who is somewhat aware, and especially the ones who aren't but will be compelled to go for Leo Di (or soon to be converts) or from the soon-to-be Leo Di army (mark my words. Leo Di army). And even for the choir who wants to be preached at, by the third part you will be happy to see so many green techs you know everyone and every kid in America ought to know exists (like the Tesla, living machines...). And you may just learn a new one or two (while i dig the Fungi Perfecti guy Paul Stamets a lot, and heard him talk about those mushrooms that eat up heavy metal spills an such, i never heard the words "mycofiltration" and "mycorestoration" before. Awesome!

And again i particularly like is that it even take that extra bold step, asking the question that really lies even at the heart of the entire climate change thing. What is it that is really happening deep at the core of us that is out of whack. Because it's not just about CO2, but about what our species has become... and where we are (very able and) headed
LeilaNAdiaConnnorskenny
kudos to Leila Connors Peterson, Her Sister Nadia Connors and of course Mr. Leo DiCaprio (that's not him. That's Kenny Ausable founder of the Bioneers (and founder exCEO of Seeds of Change, and filmaker).

Oh heck. go see the movie when it hits your town! and in the meantime, the website they have is pretty good to see what it's all about, including everyone interviewed and much much more... go!
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: birdbard
2007-08-24 12:44 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I'm psyched to see this, and have been following clips and replies view their youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/11thhouraction

Thanks for the quick review!
[User Picture]From: scalarparty
2007-08-24 01:24 pm (UTC)

(Link)

your welcome, twas a pleasure. this is really a great flick.
[User Picture]From: birdbard
2007-08-24 02:17 pm (UTC)

Your thoughts?

(Link)

[User Picture]From: scalarparty
2007-08-24 02:55 pm (UTC)

Re: Your thoughts?

(Link)

My thoughts:

1) its from the Inhofe blog so you do have to search for the signal out from the noise and Inhofe is almost all noise.
2) The main guy they are talking to is an Astronomer talking about economics (I like economics talked about by people who um, study economics. In particular economics that includes externalities, and who are free of economic fundamentalism, and able to see the benefits [economic benefits] to doing all those "Trillions of dollars" of kyoto things)..
3) yes, the numbers are not accurate. right now, so many of the feedback systems ("positive feedback" and "negative feedback" loops) haven't been exacted. so there is uncertainty sure, and it is a +/- thing, but unlikely that a 1 degree Kelvin change even (average, so that would be maybe 3K at the poles) will not lead to more greater changes... so arguing about things that will only get greater resolution the closer we get to the possible climate crisis (that very conservative scientists will not accept until its in out face, as if it isn't already) is foolhardy.

and doing it at this point is pretty much a gamble of a career in my opinion. Of the people are right, then they will be hailed as the calm minds when everyone else was playing "children's game" and if they're wrong, well well all be dead so it wont matter. i guess that my thoughts on that... Inhofe is a clown.
[User Picture]From: birdbard
2007-08-24 04:34 pm (UTC)

Re: Your thoughts?

(Link)

Thanks for the signal!
[User Picture]From: a_steep_hill
2007-08-24 05:22 pm (UTC)

Here there be math...

(Link)

[User Picture]From: scalarparty
2007-08-24 05:35 pm (UTC)

Re: Here there be math...

(Link)

"this paper from Stephen Schwartz is making a bit of a splash in the delusionosphere"

heh heh... thanks for the awesome link, Brent!